I had a Statistics professor in Undergrad whose pet peeve was the website ratemyprofessor.com. He spent three whole lectures talking about how ridiculous the concept was. “I could have gone on there and left ALL the comments about me by myself, and nobody would know the difference!”, he’d say. I hope he never goes into Law Enforcement, because now we have ratemycop.com, which operates in about the same way. I’ll spare you all the usual “they have the right to say what they want, bla bla bla” disclaimer and go right into three reasons why something like ratemycom.com is just not a good idea.
1) The public in general has very little understanding about what police officers actually do, specifically about what good officers do. The media is to blame here. The actions of the nation’s best police largely go unreported, while news outlets strive to dig up any mistakes or corruption and spread it around like manure on a field. Thus, the public isn’t in any position to comment intelligently on whether or not a police officer is doing his or her job properly. Hence, it’s not a good idea to make a website that by its nature will only exacerbate the ignorance about police activities.
2) Since few people know what good police work really is, to include the makers of the website evidently, the rating system concocted by these guys is really lame. Authority, Fairness, and Satisfaction are the three rated categories for officers. I don’t even get what Authority is supposed to mean. Does a high rating indicate overbearing tyrannical power-hunger or does it mean self-assertion and being in control of tough situations? Does a low rating mean the same officer is a wimp, and isn’t that just as bad as the other end of the pendulum? Fairness is a strange idea when you’re dealing with drunk drivers, homicidal 5th graders, wife-beating crackheads, an ex-convicts. Satisfaction is the most ridiculous one of all. It’s basically saying that the only way to be a good police is to keep everybody “satisfied”. So don’t put that drunk driver or wife-beater or jail escapee in jail, because then your Satisfaction rating just took a huge nosedive.
3) The results of any of these “ratings” cannot be anything but entirely subjective and wholly misleading as to the actual conduct and ability of a police officer. The only people that are going to take time out of their lives to go on the Internet, look up police officers on some random website, and leave a comment are those who are really pissed off at them. Interestingly, that accounts for the majority of people with which the police come into contact. As has been said in the past, police see people at their “saddest, maddest, and baddest”. Not only that, but there’s no way of knowing just who is leaving the comments, how many they leave, and if they even know anything about who they leave them about. The whole thing is like putting jet fuel into the gas tank of the Ignorancemobile, and with what purpose?
Not to mention that it’s not a good idea to piss off an entire nation of Law Enforcement agencies, which is exactly what these einsteins have done with their little nickel thrown into the wishing-well of Free Speech.
Posted by Excessive Use
I read a cool article today on
Posted by Excessive Use
Posted by Excessive Use